|
Tzav
The sicha for parshas Tzav is in
Vol. VII of Likkutei Sichos.
With the mitzvahs that G-d gave to Moshe and told him to repeat them
to the Jewish people, we find three expressions of speech used,
“daber” speak to the children of Israel, “emor” say to the children
of Israel, and “tzav” command the children of Israel. And although
all the mitzvahs, even those that were given in the form of “speak”
or “say”, are all called “mitzvah”, from the word “tzav” “tziva”,
there must be a difference in their meaning and significance. In
those mitzvahs in which the word “tzav” appears and it is stated
clearly that this is a commandment, it must mean that in this
mitzvah, the tzav is stronger, the commandment is stronger than in
the other two.
It
says in Torah Kohanim, and in Rashi at the beginning of the parsha,
that wherever it says “tzav” it means an urgent command for right
away and for all time to come, zrizus m’yad u l’doros. Chassidus
says that mitzvah comes from the word “tzavza”, connection, a
joining - it joins the Jew who is doing the mitzvah with G-d. In
Torah, wherever there are two explanations it means they must be
related in some way, therefore these two definitions of mitzvah,
that it is a command rather than a statement, and that it is a
connection are connected to each other.
The joining of a Jew with G-d comes
through the performance of the mitzvah, which is carried out because
it is a commandment, instructed by G-d to do. In other words, the
mitzvah is not done out of conviction, because it feels right or
other such reasons, it is done because this is what G-d
instructed, this is what G-d said. It is
done out of the acceptance of
G-d’s authority, of G-d’s kingdom, of the kingdom of heaven, and so
when we do the mitzvah as a “tziviu” as a “tzav” a commandment, then
it has the affect of being “tzavza v’hibur” it connects us to G-d.
And so those commandments that are given in the form of a “tzav”
must also have a greater degree of tzavza v’hibur, of greater
connection and joining with G-d.
To
understand this, we first have to explain the effect of a mitzvah
according to Chassidus.
The
Creator and the created being have no essential connection between
them. Because they are so distant from each other that there is no
point of contact. In fact, relative to the existence of G-d,
creation has no existence. Chassidus gives the example of a great
chocham, who because of his chochmah, his brilliant mind, his entire
reality is that of sechel, of intelligence. To this kind of person,
the simple person who is devoid of intelligence has absolutely no
existence whatsoever.
To
the chocham, the simple person does not exist. This distance,
between the creation and the Creator, cannot even be described as a
negative relationship, as if to say that the existence of the
created being is nothing compared to the existence of G-d. Rather
the created being has no existence at all. This is what Chassidus is
teaching us with the example of the chocham and the simple person.
It is not that the simple person has less wisdom than the chocham,
and therefore the chocham doesn’t consider him significant. There is
no comparison between them at all, not even enough to say that one
is not intelligent compared to the other. To the great chocham the
simple person is not only very far, at the opposite end of the
spectrum, but they don’t belong to the same universe. And therefore
the simple person doesn’t exist in the world of the chocham, not
even to the degree where he is excluded from that category.
Now
if this is true between a chocham and a simple person, who are both
created beings, how much more so is it true concerning the Creator
and His creation, where the Creator is completely infinite, the true
infinite, and the created being is completely finite. Therefore the
distance between them is indescribable, cannot be expressed even in
the exclusion of one from the other.
And
so what happens when G-d gives a commandment? When the Creator
commands the Jew to do a mitzvah, the connection will actually
happen when the person fulfills the mitzvah, but even before he does
it, the fact that he was commanded already creates a bond and a
connection between the Commander and the commanded. And that
connection remains even if the person violates the commandment, or
fails to fulfill the commandment. Because when the person violates
the commandment, he is not out of the realm of this connection, but
rather that his connection has taken a negative turn. He is doing
the opposite of G-d’s will. But a non-Jew who is not commanded the
mitzvah, it can’t be said of a non-Jew that he is doing the opposite
of G-d’s will, because he is not in the category of the mitzvahs
where G-d’s will applies to him, even
to the degree where he can deny
G-d’s will or do the opposite of G-d’s will. But when a Jew sins, he
is doing the opposite of G-d’s will, because G-d still wants him to
do the mitzvah, and he is doing the opposite of what G-d wants. So
he is the pursuing the relationship but in a negative manner.
And
that is the meaning of the verse that says that even when a Jew
sins, he is still connected to G-d by the very fact that he is
commanded and that G-d wants him to do the mitzvah. So when we say
that every mitzvah brings about a connection, it means that when the
commandment is given, a connection is created, when the commandment
is fulfilled, then not only is there a connection but there is
actually a significance. Like the example of the chocham and the
simple person, when the chocham asks the simple person to run him an
errand, that itself makes the simple person exist in the world of
the chocham, and then if the simple person does the errand then that
makes the simple person significant in the world of the chocham. So
first there is an existence and then by the doing the deed
significance is attained. Therefore when we say there are certain
commandments that were given in the form of a “tzav” that there in
those mitzvahs there is a greater amount of connectedness, a greater
amount of “tzavza v’hibur”.
The
difference between “emor” say, “daber” speak and “tzav” command, is
that when “speak” or “say” is, it is implies that what is being
asked depends completely on the choice of the person to respond or
not to respond. When “command” is said, that implies that there is
a commander, a certain authority and that this authority is
demanding a particular behavior. There is not as much room for the
person’s freedom of choice to do or not to do; the authority of the
commander is in a sense compelling him to do it.
So
wherever it says “emor” or “daber” there is a certain amount of
freedom left to the Jew to choose to do or not to do, and so the
connection, the “tzavza v’hibur” that results is primarily a result
of the doing, not so much of the commanding, or of the instruction.
But where it says “tzav”, there even before the doing, even before
the mitzvah is fulfilled, there is already a strong connection in
the very fact that the person is commanded or in a sense compelled
to do the mitzvah because it is almost certain that he will do it.
This needs further explanation.
Every Jew has freedom of choice in all mitzvahs, including those
mitzvahs that were worded as a tzav, as a compelling commandment. So
how can we say it the tzav mitzvah there is less freedom of choice?
Mitzvahs in general are in three columns: the right, the left and
the center column. In the right column is “emor”, “say to the
children of Israel”. Emor is lashon raka, a soft command. On the
left side is “daber” “speak to the children of Israel”. Daber is
lashon kashe, a harsh statement. In the center column there is tzav,
which means a different kind of expression, which is neither right
nor left, soft nor harsh.
The
middle column according to Kabbalah rises to the inner part of the
crown of G-d’s will, whereas the right and left sides reach only the
external part of the crown. The external part of the crown means the
will itself; the internal part of G-d’s will is G-d Himself, the
Baal Haratzon, He who has the will. So the mitzvahs that are in the
right and left column reach into the will of G-d, they fulfill G-d’s
will or they violate G-d’s will. Those commandments that are in the
center column reach G-d Himself; they either fulfill G-d or violate
G-d Himself.
And
so just as there is a difference between the mitzvahs that are of
the right and left sides versus the ones that are in the middle, the
difference being that they affect the Commander differently, the
same is true also on their affects on the commanded, on the Jew. The
mitzvahs that are on the right and left side, they affect the
external part of the will of the Jew’s neshama, whereas the mitzvahs
that are in the center column, just as they reach into the essence
of G-d’s will, to the inner part of G-d’s will, to G-d Himself,
similarly they also affect the essence of the neshama not only the
will of the neshama. And likewise in the center column, there is a
connection between the essence of G-d and the essence of the
neshama, pnimiyus of the maalah and the pnimiyus of the matah, of
the Jew below.
That is why in these certain mitzvahs, the expression “tzav” is
used. Then we are more certain that the mitzvah will be fulfilled
because freedom of choice applies only in the external parts of the
neshama. The fact that a Jew could choose good or G-d forbid evil is
true only of the external part of the neshama, where there can be a
tendency towards the evil as well as towards the good. But in the
pnimiyus haneshama, in the inner part of the neshama, there is no
unholy side; there is no conflict between holy and unholy. Even
while a Jew is committing a sin, by force of the external part of
the neshama, the inner part of the neshama remains innocent and does
not involve itself in the sin at all. As the Rambam says, when a Jew
sometimes does what is not allowed, it is imposed on him from the
external, because the pnimiyus of his neshama is not capable of
sinning.
To
understand this, the Rambam himself says that every person can
choose to do whatever it is he desires, the good or the bad, and so
he is capable of sinning, of doing the opposite of good. Since when
he does the opposite of good it is because he chose to do it, how
can the Rambam then also say that he is being forced to sin and that
it is not his will, it is not his choice to do the sin. The
explanation is that the fact that a person can choose to go right or
left, do right and wrong, is by virtue of the external part of the
neshama. But when the internal part is revealed, then he is
incapable of sinning. Therefore when a person is sinning, it is
overwhelming the inner part of his neshama, and it is going against
the desire of the inner part of his neshama. This is considered as
if his yetzer hara forced him.
That’s why these mitzvahs that are given in the form of a tzav,
because they are from the center column, which it relates to the
pnimiyus haneshama where there really is no choice but to do good,
then there is a certainty about the fulfillment of that mitzvah.
Now
there is another question.
Since the fulfillment of a mitzvah has to be in the physical, which
means that he has to use the external part of his neshama, what
difference does it make, and of what significance is it that the
inner part of his neshama wants to do the mitzvah? How can we be
sure that the person will fulfill these mitzvahs that belong to the
center column because of his pnimiyus haneshama, he has to fulfill
them with the acts of the external part of his neshama, and that is
why we are told that one of the characteristics of the center is
that it reaches high to the inner part of the neshama, and it
reaches down low to the lowest level, it influences even the
external part of the neshama, and causes it to do the mitzvah.
Now
it will be understood the connection between the mitzvahs that are
given in the form of a tzav and of the zrizus m’yad u l’doros, the
urgent command for right away and for all time to come. Zrizus
means urgency and immediacy. What would cause a person to be lacking
in zrizus? When a decision has been made in the mind, and before it
comes down to affect the person’s behavior, sometimes it gets stuck,
because the person starts rationalizing it and therefore it gets
stuck in the emotion, in the action part, and even if he does end up
doing it, he loses much of the enthusiasm of the original intensity.
It is lost in the process, so that by the time he does it, it is
without enthusiasm. But when the mind is clear, when there is a
direct connection, as there is in the middle column, which is of the
highest to the lowest, then as soon as he makes a decision to do
something good, it immediately affects his behavior, and the act,
the mitzvah is done.
And
when a person in his heart makes a resolution in the nefesh powers
and it gets expressed immediately in behavior without any limits or
restrictions, without losing any of its enthusiasm, because there is
no difference to him between the intelligence, the highest of all
human faculties, and the action part, the lowest part of the human
faculties, he is connected directly from the top to the bottom, he
therefore causes the same to happen in the world, that he brings
this effect into the world m’yad u l’doros, immediately and for
generations to come because he has transcended those restrictions
and those limitations that separate past, present and future.
So
all parts of time are joined and united immediately and forever. And
this is what Reb Shimon bar Yochai says in addition to what we are
saying here, particularly when it comes to those mitzvahs, which
involve giving money, there greater zrizus is needed. By the mitzvah
of tzedaka, here you have to have more zrizus. So even though zrizus
in general comes from the middle column, from that which reaches
into the core of the neshama and all the way down into the feet to
make the behavior happen immediately, but when it comes to tzedaka,
in order to give tzedaka properly, here you need an even greater
amount of zrizus, which means you need to reach even deeper into the
core of the neshama, into the middle column itself you have to go
higher and lower, reach up higher and affect down lower.
The
mitzvah of tzedaka is connected with “b’chol meodecha”, because when
it says you should love G-d with all your heart, with all your soul,
with all your might, all your heart means emotions, all your soul
means with your life, and all your might means with your money, with
your possessions. With all your might also means endlessly, without
any restrictions. When it comes to the mitzvah of tzedaka, here you
have to reach into the “b’chol meodecha”, it is not enough to have
with all your heart and with all your soul, it has to be with all
your might.
It
explains in Tanya that the mitzvah of tzedaka is unique for two
reasons. One is that it affects the entire animal soul. Since a
person can buy himself food, which will keep his soul alive, when he
gives away this money it is as if he is giving his life away to G-d.
Secondly when he gives tzedaka, he is bringing to G-d not only
himself and his animal soul, but also his physical portion of the
world that is his, his possessions.
So
according to the principle that the higher something is the lower it
can come, when you need to affect not only your animal soul but also
the physical objects of your life, for this you need to reach even
deeper into the neshama. And with this we will understand why Reb
Shimon bar Yochai was the one who said that when it comes to tzedaka
you have to have even more zrizus, you have to reach even deeper
into your neshama and connect it not only with your animal soul but
with the physical material wealth that is the tzedaka. Reb Shimon
bar Yochai was the one who excelled in his ability to bring together
the highest and the lowest. As is known that he was able to cause it
to rain, not by praying for rain, as is usually the case, but by
saying Torah, by giving a teaching in Torah. This is the connection
of the highest with the lowest. And that is why he was the one who
could say that when it comes to the mitzvah of tzedaka, you reach
higher into your neshama and affect the mitzvah that involves the
lowest of the low, the physical objects of our lives.
|
 |
It's Good To Know

It's Good News
|